In any corner of the world, at any degree of defeat, at any degree of loss for the neocolonial and American axis (America, Israel, Western Europe), not only will Muslims be happy, but neutral disbelievers who have an understanding of the world will also be happy.

And if Allah's law is established on even an inch of land, whoever's hand it may be by, how can a Muslim not be happy? Who are they who want to make being happy a crime?

At any loss to Britain, France, America, Israel, India, or the overthrow of any tyrant who protects their interests, which Muslim will not be happy?

Their course of action might be wrong in your or my eyes, we might not subscribe to their ideology, we might think it is not suitable for my territory, but why should one be unhappy at their victory?

Those who call those groups by adding the word 'bal' (pubic hair), who are they really? What is their ideology? Do they want Islam, do they want the victory of Islam, or what do they want? If you are right, may Allah destroy me. And if I am right, may Allah destroy you.

What is the phobia deep inside towards? Do they dislike Sharia itself? Do they dislike the obligatory commandment of war against the disbeliever*? It seems so.

I have only one standard. This is how I choose friendship and disassociation. Certainly, America is the villain of the whole world. Whoever can even give a slap to them and their accomplices, I will celebrate them, whoever they may be. And if they can raise the flag of the Sharia of Ahlus Sunnah by slapping the American axis, they are my hero. The hero of the Caliphate-less Muslim. And to the American axis, a militant. If I am a militant to the American axis, then I am a militant.

#I_am_also_a_militant

* Offensive J-had: Fard Kifayah (collective obligation)

Defensive J-had: Gradual Fard Ayn (individual obligation)

[Book of Fiqh Al-Hidayah]

© Shamsul Arefin Shakti

#SeriousBrother